Tag Archives: wealth management

How High Is Too High?


The S&P 500 logged a stellar first quarter of 2024, rising just over 10% in 3 months. Moreover, it has gained more than 28% since the October low, just five months ago. It is likely that something will happen to trigger a sell-off from these levels. Trying to time a correction is not a good strategy. Sometimes momentum begets momentum. We could see another 10% rise before a reversal. The price of market returns is volatility. It might help to view part of the recent gains as “cushion” to offset a correction.

We’ve Come a Long Way

I am attempting to lean into rising risk by delaying new cash deployments and allocating new funds to value oriented positions. On the positive side, the Morningstar Market Valuation indicator suggests that the market is only 4% overvalued. That does not suggest a change in strategy, but I see significant parts of the S&P 500 trading at valuations that stretch my imagination.


Valuation and concentration risks are becoming elevated, but a correction is not inevitable in the near term. The key factor, as usual, is earnings and cash flow growth that provide fundamental support for market valuations. Another moderate risk factor would be fewer or delayed rate cuts. More impactful, but less likely factors include an inflation rebound or an earnings slowdown.

The overall outlook remains positive based on the four supporting themes including:

  1. Stable growth
  2. Falling inflation
  3. Impending Fed rate cuts
  4. AI enthusiasm

I will be watching these developments.

Past performance does not indicate future performance. Investing involves risk, including loss of investing principal.

Taking Stock of the Rally

The S&P 500 finished 2023 up 24.23% (Morningstar data source). Even though the index was positive throughout the year, the volatility was challenging.

(SPY is an ETF that tracks the S&P 500. Graph illustrates SPY performance for 2023)

Expectations of lower interest rates and a soft or no landing drove the rally during the past two months. Four important assumptions underpin current expectations.

The market consensus supporting valuations includes:
1. Six rate cuts for a 1.5% cut in the discount rate, bringing the year-end fed funds rate below 4%.
2. No economic slowdown/sustained earnings growth
3. Geopolitical conflicts do not worsen.
4. Domestic political situation does not deteriorate.

These assumptions are not necessarily wrong, but they may be optimistic. The issue is how events surrounding these issues unfold.

Other observations to keep in mind as 2024 kicks off. The Magnificent 7 large cap tech stocks that comprise about 28% of the market cap weighted index (as of 12/19/2023) overshadow the S&P 500 performance. Using the S&P 500 as a benchmark is problematic in that it skews the risk/return of the broader market. I expect the market to broaden as the rest of the market plays catchup and large cap tech cools.

Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. Past experience does not predict future returns. I could go and and list all the other boilerplate language that regulators like to see, but I’ll stop here. If you have any questions about anthing inferred from this post, please consult with me or another investment advisor.

The Pause that Refreshes

The S&P 500 closed the 3rd quarter with a gain of about 14.7% YTD, despite recent volatility that brought it down about 5% off the highs. (International holdings continued to lag, causing diversified portfolios to generally come in a bit lower.) There are several issues creating enough headlines to spook the market, including inflation, the debt ceiling and potential Government shutdown, tax increases, supply chain disruptions, Fed tapering and the yield curve, and the continuing Covid pandemic. What could go wrong?

I could analyze each issue and explain why they might be more bark than bite, or why they are probably already factored into the market. However, I do have a real concern that the market will have to reckon with, valuation. The market is priced to perfection at about 20x 2022 earnings. Interest rates need to go up for long-term economic stability, and the market valuation math means the market valuation multiple needs to decline. The decline in valuation will not be absolute since it will be offset by presumably rising earnings. Theoretically the multiple could contract without a nominal decline in the market, given sufficient earnings growth, especially in an environment with a healthy dose of inflation. However, I expect interest rates will go up and the market will have an adjustment on the order of a 10% decline sometime within the next 6 – 12 months.

That would be a healthy part of normalization and allow for better long-term returns. Part of the past 3 years gains can be attributed to the Fed’s persistent stimulus. We may be beginning the pause that refreshes. The underlying economy is sound. Supply constraints are preferable to waning demand.

Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. Choose wisely.

The State of the Yield Curve

The yield curve is getting a lot of attention because it has flattened 65 basis points this year. Although the yield curve is a good indicator of where we are in the economic cycle, it does not indicate a recession is likely. Fundamental data are supportive of economic expansion.

(Source: Bloomberg, NBER, GSAM, as of 11/30/2107)

Beware the Pundits

Not much has changed since my last blog post, and I don’t have any revelations to share. Trump is still talking about the same issues he mentioned in his campaign. Real change happens slowly. But the drift is real, and that has unleashed animal spirits in the markets.

The gains to date are not purely about valuation. Currently, 70% of companies have reported 4Q earnings, and 2/3 have beaten estimates, according to Forbes. Earnings are improving and the real question is how steep and how long the trend will run.

All things being equal, higher valuations increase risk. If price-to-earnings multiples expand faster than earnings growth, the risk of a correction increases. Without calling names, geopolitical risk seems to be an ongoing factor, so it seems a matter of time until a crisis scares the bejeepers out of the market and everyone scurries to cash.

A Buffet saying comes to mind, “Be fearful when others are greedy, and greedy when others are fearful.” I’m sensing an increase in the greed factor as investors hate missing a rally. This might be a good time to think about harvesting positions you wouldn’t buy at today’s prices, and be very picky about your reinvestment options. Dry powder can go a long way in a correction.

Longer-term, the table is set for sustained and perhaps accelerating, earnings growth. In the 90’s, everyone thought the market would average 12% forever. Now the pundits agree 8% seems ambitious. When have the pundits ever gotten it right?

Finally, recognize that volatility is the price we pay for equity returns. Plan accordingly and stay the course.

Post Election Outlook

The election is finally over.  Markets are beginning to price in the upside potential of a shift to a pro-growth government led infrastructure-led fiscal spending.  This is something I have cited over the past couple of years as the missing piece of policy that could stimulate the economy, given that monetary policy has run its course.

Trump didn’t include a lot of detail in his campaign rhetoric.  Maybe he doesn’t know the details, but we can certainly ascertain his drift.  We do know an administration is a lot more than one person, and collectively, these others will bring the expertise to Trump’s agenda.

We can expect an increase in infrastructure spending.

Trump is known for putting his name on large buildings.  Just imagine if he were President.  According to Capital Group, the spending he has suggested would add up to half a percent per year to GDP over the next four years.

Trump has pledged to lower tax rates for individuals and corporations.  One way to pay for cuts would be to expand the amount subject to tax, which points to a deal for repatriation of the estimated $2 trillion of US corporate earnings held overseas.

Trade is the area most directly controlled by the President.  Trump’s threats to bully concessions from trading partners might work, but also carry the risk of starting trade wars or worse.  However, as occurred with Brexit and Grexit, the votes and threats created leverage, and pressure for concessions.  Perhaps he can negotiate a better deal.

Trump likes to negotiate from a position of strength and has emphasized the need for a strong military.  Increased defense spending to beef up homeland security and offensive capabilities should benefit defense contractors and industrial suppliers.

Health care is another area of focus.  Trump campaigned on repealing the Affordable Care Act.  It is unlikely the 20 million people added to health insurance rolls will be dumped, but the program will be rebranded and modified to reduce the worst imbalances.  Insurance companies will muddle through changes and pharmaceutical companies will still contend with pressure for price regulation.  While more positive than we would have expected a Clinton administration, the outcome is not clear.

He says he wants to repeal Graham-Dodd.  Banking regulation has placed serious regulatory burdens on financial companies.  Some question whether the regulations are adequate, but there is evidence of overreach and unnecessary compliance overhead.  It would be nice to see fewer rules based institutional regulations and more principles-based enforcement of laws to control individuals that compromise the public interest.

It might be best to view the Trump impact as a change in drift, not a full overhaul.

A Vital Sign for the Economy

When the stock market gets stressed by a correction, emotions are magnified. Commentators attribute daily swings to the headline of the day.

One data point worth reviewing is from the American Association of Railroads (AAR). The AAR publishes weekly data on rail traffic.

According to the report for the week ending February 13, 2016, “total U.S. weekly rail traffic was 505,148 carloads and intermodal units, down 3.8 percent compared with the same week last year.” Total freight cars and intermodal units are down 5.8 percent compared to last year for the first 6 weeks this year. But of the 10 carload commodity groups, miscellaneous was up 27.4 percent and motor vehicles and parts were up 12.6 percent.

The sectors posting decreases compared to the same period in 2015 included, “coal, down 32.5 percent to 75,249 carloads; petroleum and petroleum products, down 23.4 percent to 11,303 carloads; and metallic ores and metals, down 15.4 percent to 19,196 carloads.”

The data points to a fairly healthy consumer sector and a supply correction in raw materials commodities. As supply adjusts to demand, prices stabilize and rebound. These are healthy adjustments for an economy on course for the old normal.

For the full AAR press release, click https://www.aar.org/newsandevents/Press-Releases/Pages/2016-02-17-railtraffic.aspx.

Random Thoughts on Investing and Politics

Which way is the market going?  If you listen to the news, you will be a pessimist, since most news is negative.  But if you pay attention to quarterly earnings reports and long-term earnings trends, you will be an optimist.

Businesses are organizations of people who get up every day to create value for customers, with profits flowing to the owners of the company as the reward for their ingenuity and placing capital at risk.  If and when profits decline, the owners and management take corrective action.  In the extreme, they might liquidate the business to avoid further loss of capital, freeing capital and labor resources for redeployment in more productive enterprise.

In 1776, Adam Smith coined the term “Invisible Hand” in a book “An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations”.  In it he wrote, “Every individual necessarily labours to render the annual revenue of the society as great as he can. He generally neither intends to promote the public interest, nor knows how much he is promoting it … He intends only his own gain, and he is in this, as in many other cases, led by an invisible hand to promote an end which was no part of his intention. Nor is it always the worse for society that it was no part of his intention. By pursuing his own interest he frequently promotes that of the society more effectually than when he really intends to promote it. I have never known much good done by those who affected to trade for the public good.”

Government intervention often impairs the efficient deployment of resources and the creative destruction of inefficient enterprise.  Subsidies and taxes distort economic incentives and reduce the efficient allocation of resources.  The invisible hand is not an outdated classical concept.  It is the natural phenomenon that guides free markets.  Capitalism drives scarce resources to their most productive use.

Socialism short circuits the resource allocation process of capitalism, removing the invisible hand from sectors of the economy.  Without a profit motive, inefficiencies tend to grow unchecked.  While segments of society may be protected, you end up with a smaller pie.

The political pendulum swings between the left and the right.

On Raising the Fed Funds Rate

When you’re drinking beer, the goal can be to drink more.  That’s a problem for some people.  They do not recognize their disequilibrium.  Putting the glass down might not bring immediate gratification, but it is simply the right thing to do with any normal, long-term perspective.fredgraph Fed Funds Rate

The Fed needs to get off the sauce.  Current interest rates compromise reasonable capital allocation, and encourages uneconomic decisions.  The longer the distortion persists, the greater the risk.  Any investment decision that gets squeezed out because of a .25% interest rate increase, at current rates, was a bad idea anyway.  That represents net positive for the economy by discouraging inferior projects and speculation.

Interest rates are the cost of money.  It shouldn’t be virtually free.

Social Security: Take or Defer?

I crunched the numbers on the question of deferring Social Security for a year to increase the payment by 8%, for each year it is deferred to age 70.  Most advice seems to favor deferral, unless health is an issue.

My numbers do not necessarily support that conclusion.  While the 8% increase can be viewed as a compelling guaranteed return, it also comes with a long payback.  The breakeven of deferring, if the safe investment rate is 3%, is about 17 years.  This may be the best case for waiting.

On the other hand, recipients with other sources of income might be able to invest their social security payments at a rate competitive with the 8% Social Security escalator.  In this case, there is little benefit for deferring.

In summary, if the first year’s SS payment is invested and earns 8%, then it is equal to the first payment if deferral is elected.  This process repeats for all payments, so the payment streams are equal.  When we consider a safe money reinvestment rate, there is a small benefit to deferral, but the payback period is long.  The decision is not as clear as I’d assumed.

My spreadsheet (in PDF format, so no formulas) is here, https://www.daltonfin.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Take-or-Defer-Spreadsheet-Analysis.pdf.